Noah_Hero
-
Posts
755 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 GBP
Content Type
Articles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by Noah_Hero
-
-
-
22 hours ago, Minipily said:
It would be nice also, if there was an option to see who has voted.
Unsuprisingly I voted for a strict arsenal.
Reasons: Immersion, as I always have been crusading for that. (Though I don`t have that much of a problem with people using non-faction weapons. For me the main part is uniforms)
-
15 hours ago, Minipily said:
I also see that CSAT is killing the population? I've been playing a mission recently where CSAT have also been doing that, I have no idea where people have been getting the idea that CSAT kill civilians though haha.
I'd guess from the IDAP-campaign-mission ('The Redacted') where you are playing as CSAT and call in an Airstrike on Oreokastro even though there are still non-combatants in the city. Though it is left open wether it actually were CSAT special-forces or NATOs CTRG but since you played the whole time only as CSAT people tend to associate only them with the airstrike.
-
@Amentes are you now becoming a professional holiday-trip-planner?
-
As always when staff changes: Please update the "Staff list & hierarchy"-post. (https://forums.ahoyworld.net/topic/9333-staff-list-hierarchy/) Also you might want to add a "XML-Manager" position for Janxol in there.
-
-
Feels bad that you`re leaving as you always had an open ear for improvement-ideas, etc and were one of the most helpful and friendly staff members. Anyways good luck along the path and as that crazy-AWE-boat-guy that I am, I very much like that the Navy was your choice!
-
AW MVP 2018: @kennychr
AW most friendly admin/staff member 2018: @Chuck
AW most helpful admin/staff member 2018: @Mark T
AW most helpful user *Non-staff* 2018: @Stanhope
AW strictest admin/staff member 2018: @Solex
AW most absent staff member 2018: @SkullCollector
AW most active staff member 2018: @Lindi
AW friendliest user 2018: @Amentes
AW most tacti-cool ARMA player 2018: there is just no way it isn´t @MoonFire
AW most incoherent ARMA player 2018: @Noah_Hero because either I was not not around, or a lot around and when around I was either super serious or getting annoyed and started to meme or just insta-Alt+F4ed.
AW best ARMA pilot 2018: @Amentes
AW worst ARMA pilot 2018: this guy backflipping his heli:
AW funniest person on Teamspeak 2018: @MoonFire
AW best drunk member 2018: Cpt. Liver-failure aka @Johnson
AW best moment 2018 (can be in any game or on teamspeak/forum): starting this:
AW best forum post 2018 (please put url in): according to @MoonFire definitly (he loved that one)
AW best driver 2018: @Johnson as no powlers were flipped this year
AW worst driver 2018: still @Amentes
AW best baby 2018: idk @fir_nevs
AW best fail 2018: biggest fail has to be starting to host SQUAD as it failed miserably
AW best banned member 2018: @TheScar
AW best TeamSpeak channel of 2018: Navigation Deck
AW best game of 2018: Arma3AW best official server of 2018: AWE
-
-
3 hours ago, Stanhope said:
So you're just getting started right? Or am I an addict with 3717 hours?
or @Jochem with his 6878 hours
-
13 hours ago, Joebillibob said:
Zeusing cannot be random now. You have to ask weeks in advance to host as Zeus. I understand the staff position to not give access to everyone other than moderators to avoid abusers. Having trusted zeus without having to moderate would be nice tho.
Just for reference: Zeusing was never random but there where a few moderators like KPJ who did great missions just midweek-straight-outta-nowhere within Stiletto/AWE, or just stopped the mission-AI and builded a completely new random mission from scratch but before you joined the server there was a bit of ranting and rage-quitting so now we have no more of them left.
-
-
16 minutes ago, MoonFire said:
Okay so if we had faction specific arsenal and say faction specific squad layout would that solve the current diversity issue??
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk
Sure in my opinion.
-
-
12 minutes ago, Ryko said:
IA4 and mods, I should add that there is discussion that this would replace the current implementation of AWE.
That instead of AWE sounds nice indeed.
-
7 minutes ago, Ryko said:
What we are bandying around is the idea of making a modded version of I&A4 which has STUI, TFAR and ACE, which I think would be much more palatable.
I feel like this will mostly just be the very same I&A-chaos but with mods.
-
1 minute ago, BorderLive said:
AWE has never been 100% serious play. It has always been a place for Team-play and fun. Immersion on AWE has MOSTLY been provided by user made missions such as Karate's Prometheus series.
Sure but these aren´t happening anymore so people like me tend to not play anymore.
1 minute ago, Sodda said:So if that "ruins game-immersion" i guess Norway should just sell their new F-35s cause they're American and that ruins my immersion...
I`m talking about people going full spec-ops-look-at-my-coolest-boiiii-EUWest-loadout-style instead of standard army of whatever nation. Also being in a fireteam made up of soldiers of 4 different nations plus one whatever-spec-ops-guy seems fairly unrealistic
-
Just now, BorderLive said:
The line is common sense. US and British factions are apart of NATO where they commonly share assets.
Unfortunately that ruins game-immersion for more serious players BUT it is a valid point wich I can understand...just makes more serious players play elsewhere.
-
Just now, Joebillibob said:
I like this. I guess this is what we have to discuss, as opinions seems to differ. Should we do a poll?
don´t want to sound pessimistic but it doesn´t matters as that is Steerings-descision anyways
-
2 minutes ago, KingFronXos said:
why change the way AWE is
because it`s shit atm and therefore no one really plays there anymore on a daily basis
-
1 hour ago, Joebillibob said:
AWE is a place for mods, there is no denying it.
Sure but still it would be enough to just go for ACE and TFAR as these are the mods that create the immersion. The rest is just cherry-on-the-top-cosmetics. As I said it doesn´t have to be heavily modded to create good gameplay and if people really can´t live without more IRL-assets then just add a bit of RHSAFRF and RHSUSAF.
-
2 minutes ago, MoonFire said:
@Noah_Hero no go back to EU1
admit it, you miss me
-
-
Even though everyone knows my opinion anyways: Less is more
+ very faction specific Arsenal (i.e. if you are USArmy you can only use UCP & OCP gear, etc.) but if too many people were complaining that they could no longer use their favourite weapon than the restrictions could only be applied to Vest, Helmets, Uniforms.
+ focus on RHS as Core mod as it provides a ton of stuff in decent quality
+ TF Radio as we already have it and people got used to it but I also wouldn´t complain if we`d go back to ACRE
+ STUI as it is better than the vanilla-group-UI
+ ACE as otherwise we could just play vanilla-Arma
- SMA as it offers not all that much more than RHS
- CUP as I dont want to play Arma 2 and it also offers a lot of RHS duplicates
- LMount as it was a nice idea but is horribly annoying if you cant just change your scope in the arsenal because that mod forces you into an annimation...Also I dont feel like that many people were abusing the instant-sight-swapping-possibility
- MGP as RHS really stepped up their game when in comes to vests wich means that we don´t need another ton of vests and it other than that just offers a bunch of uniforms wich goes against the idea of a "faction specific Arsenal" anyways
- Special Saus because no one needs these beards
~ maps as for me the vanilla maps are good enough and I dont really need other ones.
~ FIR because I am never flying on AWE so I can´t tell you wether we need it or not
~ 3CB is genereally a nice mod and fits with the idea of a "faction specific Arsenal" but I would not really miss it if it was gone
(+ = keep, - = ditch, ~ = idk)
- Johnson, GhostDragon, Amentes and 2 others
-
5
Tanoa on AWE? [Poll]
in Enhanced Server Information And Discussion
Posted
SANDbox-game
