Jump to content

Joebillibob

Community Member
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 GBP 

Posts posted by Joebillibob

  1. I had a discussion with staff about the rally point. It's principal use is for when the server is low pop, like BB said. 

     

    Sure, you can spawn one when we have a lot of people in the server, but it should be discouraged. I had to explain this to some people and they seemed to understant the "realism" aspect of it.

     

    I would not get rid of this feature, but speak to thoses who use it when there is a vortex element to convince them otherwise. 

     

    Chain of command always win, but we can give our opinions.

  2. 2 hours ago, Amentes said:

    I don't see it as personal preference, I see it as a skilled and an unskilled player :P

    Well now i am offended ?

     

    I get the real life argument, but since AWE is more gameplay focused and less realism/milsim, i would have no problem to see it reintroduced.

     

    As always, personal opinion. ?

  3. 2 hours ago, Amentes said:

    I greatly dislike it when a 14-man squad starts looking like they recruited off Craigslist and all the recruits brought their own gear from their local supplier.

    Well, on AWE at least, ASL or PlatCo can always force people to wear the same camo, but i only saw this once since i joined a couple months ago. 

     

    All we need is more people wanting to be Lead, thing that i see rarely. Waaay too much bitching/responsibility for some. Can't say i disagree haha

  4. 1 minute ago, Amentes said:

    Maybe that's a valid point though?

     

    No spare barrel means there's a semi-serious consequence to continuous fire, and thus it might be that continuous fire will happen less frequently?

     

    I'm not really for or against, just thinking out loud :)

    Well it all come down with personal preference.

     

    If you know you will auto fire a lot, you can think ahead and bring spare barrel.

     

    Be punished if you don't bring it.

  5. 6 minutes ago, Zeexe said:

    More content = More things to do

    Well i not agreeing with this personally, not at all cost anyway.

     

    I like having more stuff, but sometimes it bring a lot more problems. Sure, you can have more weapons, but when you realise you have 3-4 types of 5.56 ammo type that are not compatible with each other, i find this really complicated when it comes to logistics.

     

    So, moderation can be good.

  6. 16 minutes ago, Ryko said:

    Civilian vehicles spawn with random amounts of damage; some are fine, some are busted up.

    I tried to partially repair the truck as an engineer. After it failed, i did a full repair with the repair truck. The truck continued to leak after this. So i moved it to a repair spot in an FOB and did a servicing.

     

    After this, the truck still leaked heavily. Maybe it was a isolated incident. I will continue to check this to see if this bug reappear.

  7. Stiletto 057

     

    Since 0.56, i have not been able to restrain any civilians. The action is not available on the ace interaction menu. the only way i was able to do so was to overdose the civi with morphine and after that restrain him. Not being able to do so complicate extraction of HVT interesting/complicated.

     

    I also was not able to select any attachements, sights or mag to the L103A2 DP. Don't know if it's a glitch on my side or not.

    20180419000953_1.jpg

  8. I was on 0.56 and i tried to change pylon on the A-10C and the progress bar showed up for the 3 pylons i tried to switch. At the end of it, it said that i was too far away. i tried to get closer, no changes. When i put the jet further away, the progress bar does not show up.

     

    Furthermore, when i get back in the plane, the pylons have been added, but are empty and cannot be reloaded when serviced. I still have my old ones.

    Jet Pylon 01.jpg

    Jet Pylon 02.jpg

  9. Hi guys

     

    I was looking on the suggestion mods and map for the enhanced server and saw one for the Chernarus Redux map. I saw that the staff mentionned that it required CUP, thus the idea was scrapped.

     

    Since there was a recent poll about the quantities and sizes of mods used, and if it was too much or not enough. I wanted to know if the staff had the same opinion than before.

     

    That map require only the CUP terrain core, which is about 3,55 gigs. That could open a new possibility of other maps with CUP without having all the CUP stuff we don't need.

     

    Like i said, i don't want to officially request it if the majority of users are against the return of CUP, even if it's only for the maps. I had a great time in Chernarus, and would like to see it in the Enhanced server.

  10. 1 minute ago, Amentes said:

    It's very much worth noting that adding Vanilla stuff into an RHS environment isn't a good recipie for a balanced experience.

     

    Load up Dev Branch, take the vanilla MAAWS, shoot at an Abrams for a bit. You'll see what I mean.

    Is it the same thing with the vehicules? Or are they more balanced if mixed with RHS stuff?

  11. 28 minutes ago, Minipily said:

    DLC has thrown us back in some cases, there was a poll to add Tanoa as a map for Stilletto and it won the poll some 25-30+ > 1, yet we never got it. A shame considering how fun the map is, I've done some milsim events on it in my time and it works a dream.

    I saw the poll about the Tanoa map, and even if i want to see the map on the rotation, i undertand why it was not added.

     

    Not everyone have the Apex DLC, and i understand that it would piss off people who doesn't have it. It was mentionned that it would be used in certain game night tho.

     

    That's different for the vehicules DLC, which can be used even if others don't possess the expansions.

     

    I guess a poll would be a good idea.

  12. 27 minutes ago, Minipily said:

    That's about all from what I can see, vanilla has some nice stuff to use on AWE but I highly doubt we'd ever see it.

    Could i know why? 

     

    I mean if there is a majority of players wanting theses new assets, why not implement it?

     

    I could see that other players not having the DLCs would be a point against having them in the server, but it would not be detrimental to others.

  13. I have been noticing, since version 0.50, a small issue that i don't know if it was already known. When being assigned to a team color by team leader, it sometimes randomly reset itself to no color on certain players.

     

    I does not seems to have a pattern (like after respawn) and seems to affect always the same player in the fireteam.

     

    I have searched the forum for this issue in the past, but haven't found anything.

×
×
  • Create New...